PA Supreme Court: Sweet Stevens Prevails in Tax Appeal Suit for Phoenixville School District
Sweet Stevens has prevailed on behalf of a school district in a $5 million tax appeal lawsuit.
Sweet Stevens Welcomes Two Attorneys
Welcome to Megan Hazel and Kalani Linnell, the newest attorneys at Sweet Stevens.
Pool Counsel Quarterly Lookback, November 2023: See what you missed!
A highlight of answers to questions asked of Pool Counsel recently by school district administrators from all over Pennsylvania.
Sweet Stevens Attorneys to Speak at Pennsylvania Bar School Law Update
David Conn and Andrea Lynne Cola are featured speakers at the PBI 2023 School Law Update.
Sweet Stevens Attorneys Present at National CASE Conference
Seven attorneys from Sweet Stevens are participating in the national CASE conference, the premier professional learning event for administrators of special education.
Rose McHugh to Speak at Education Law Association Conference
Rose McHugh is scheduled to present at the Educational Law Association conference in Reno-Tahoe: a three-day event offering a multitude of sessions on current legal issues affecting education and the rights of those involved in education.
Sweet Stevens Attorneys Plan, Present at 2023 PBI Exceptional Children Conference
Two attorneys from Sweet, Stevens, Katz & Williams are taking a lead role at the annual Pennsylvania Bar Institute Exceptional Children Conference, one of the premier special education conferences in the commonwealth.
Cola, Schmitt to Present at PA Special Education Leadership Symposium
Andrea Lynne Cola and Tammy J. Schmitt are featured speakers at the upcoming PA Special Education Leadership Symposium.
Pool Counsel Quarterly Lookback, August 2023: See what you missed!
A highlight of answers to questions asked of Pool Counsel recently by school district administrators from all over Pennsylvania.
Sweet Stevens Prevails for Manheim Township in FAPE Suit
Mark W. Cheramie Walz has prevailed on behalf of a client before the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in a case where parents argued that a school district did not meet a child’s academic, social and emotional needs.